Last reviewed: March 2026Sources: PubMed, FDA, WADA Prohibited List
Evidence graded using the PeptideScholar A-D system.
Adamax
Modified Semax analog (adamantane-capped)7 amino acids
DLimited Data
50
Fair Credibility
2 cited studies | Evidence level D
Not FDA Approved
Adamax is a modified, more lipophilic analog of Semax in which the N-terminal acetyl group is replaced with an adamantane moiety. Semax itself is a synthetic fragment of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH(4-7)) with a C-terminal Pro-Gly-Pro tripeptide. The adamantane modification is claimed to increase blood-brain barrier penetration and extend half-life. There are zero published studies on Adamax specifically — all evidence is extrapolated from Semax research.
Mechanism of Action
Mechanism is extrapolated from Semax: Semax increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) expression, modulates dopaminergic and serotonergic systems, and upregulates neuroprotective gene expression. The adamantane group (also found in memantine, an NMDA antagonist for Alzheimer's) may confer additional membrane affinity and CNS penetration, but this claim is unverified for Adamax.
Benefits
Semax increases BDNF expression and provides neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia models[1]
Semax modulates dopaminergic and serotonergic brain systems — shown in rodent studies[2]
Semax shows nootropic and analgesic effects in animal models
The adamantane modification MAY improve brain penetration, but this is theoretical — no studies confirm this
Not medical advice - research-reported information only
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.
No established dosing. Adamax is a research chemical with no clinical studies. Anecdotal reports suggest intranasal doses of 100–400 μg, but this is entirely unvalidated. Semax is used in Russia at 0.1–1.0 mg intranasally for cognitive disorders. Extrapolating from Semax data is speculative and may not reflect Adamax pharmacology.
The dosing information above is sourced from published research literature and clinical trials. These are not recommendations. Individual responses vary. Always consult a healthcare provider before considering any peptide-based therapy.
Side Effects
No safety data exists for Adamax specifically — zero published studies
Semax has a favorable safety profile in Russian clinical use, but Adamax may differ
Unknown long-term neurological effects
No regulatory approval in any jurisdiction
Considering peptide research?
Adamax is not FDA-approved. Always consult a licensed healthcare provider before considering any peptide.
Semax increased dopamine and serotonin turnover in rodent brain regions, providing mechanistic basis for nootropic effects
References
1.The peptide semax affects the expression of genes related to the immune and vascular systems in rat brain focal ischemia.. BMC Genomics, 2014. "Semax significantly altered gene expression in rat brain following ischemia, upregulating neuroprotective and vascular remodeling genes" [PMID: 24661604]
2.Semax, an ACTH(4-10) analogue with nootropic properties, activates dopaminergic and serotoninergic brain systems in rodents.. Neurochem Res, 2005. "Semax increased dopamine and serotonin turnover in rodent brain regions, providing mechanistic basis for nootropic effects" [PMID: 16362768]
Recommended Resources
The Peptide Protocols Handbook
Evidence-based reference guide covering mechanisms, research, and clinical applications.
Amazon affiliate links; we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. See our disclosure.
Adamax FAQ
Medical Disclaimer
This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations.
Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting, stopping, or modifying any treatment. Do not disregard professional medical advice based on information found on this site.
No claims of therapeutic efficacy are made for substances that are not FDA-approved for the discussed indications. Research citations reflect published findings and do not imply endorsement.